According to @OnchainDataNerd, wallet 0xB85 withdrew 12,287 ETH from Binance, deposited it to AAVE, and borrowed 20M USDT to accumulate another 6,787 ETH. According to @OnchainDataNerd, the address now holds a total of 40,974 ETH valued around 121M USD and carries 63M USDT debt on AAVE, with the address link provided in the source. Based on the figures reported by @OnchainDataNerd, the implied average entry is approximately 2,953 USD per ETH (121M divided by 40,974) and the current debt-to-collateral value ratio is about 52 percent (63M divided by 121M), reflecting a leveraged long achieved by borrowing stablecoins to buy ETH, consistent with AAVE borrowing mechanics described in Aave documentation. Per Aave documentation, position risk is governed by the health factor and liquidation occurs if it falls below 1, while ongoing costs come from the variable USDT borrow rate published on Aave markets. The 12,287 ETH moved off Binance reduces exchange balances by that amount according to @OnchainDataNerd.

According to @EmberCN, ETH whale address 0xa339, known for loop-lending long strategies, sold 5,230 ETH at $3,013 within the past 20 minutes for $15.75 million, source: @EmberCN. Over the last week, the address offloaded a total of 25,829 ETH for $74.85 million at an average exit price of $2,898, source: @EmberCN. The whale’s reported cost basis is $2,545 per ETH, translating to a realized profit of $9.11 million on these sales and a per-coin spread of $353, source: @EmberCN. The address still holds approximately 24,700 ETH valued around $74.48 million, source: @EmberCN.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a high win-rate trader who reportedly made $19M profit in one month opened a 3x ETH long position of approximately $89M notional on Hyperliquid; the trader address is provided for verification (source: @OnchainDataNerd; legacy.hyperdash.com/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902). Traders can monitor this address for changes in position size, PnL, and risk metrics on Hyperdash to inform ETH perp strategy in real time (source: legacy.hyperdash.com/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902).

According to @EmberCN, the same whale who previously shorted after CZ showcased ASTER holdings now holds an ETH long that came within $28 of liquidation before an ETH rebound erased a roughly $44M unrealized loss. According to @EmberCN, the trader did not close the position and instead added size, and with ETH back around $2,800 the liquidation level is again close, about $100 from spot. According to @EmberCN, this implies the estimated liquidation zone is roughly near $2,700 based on the cited $100 distance from the ~$2,800 spot level.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, trader Maji closed a four-day ETH long for a $1.872 million realized loss, leaving $15,919.64 in the account; source: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2000820683409121644. According to @ai_9684xtpa, this marked six straight long losses totaling $2.49 million, and the same Hyperliquid account has accumulated $21.25 million in losses since May; sources: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2000820683409121644 and https://hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872. According to @ai_9684xtpa, a subsequent liquidation removed 6,489 ETH for a $720,000 loss, leaving a 2,500 ETH long worth about $7.79 million with the latest liquidation price at $3,074.62 and unrealized PnL of negative $314,000; sources: https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1999506971557499002 and https://hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872. These position sizes, realized PnL, and the stated liquidation price are visible on the Hyperbot account page for ongoing monitoring; source: https://hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872.

According to @OnchainLens, Machi (@machibigbrother) was partially liquidated on a 25x Ethereum (ETH) long as the market declined, based on on-chain monitoring shared on X on Dec 11, 2025. Source: Onchain Lens on X. According to @OnchainLens, the trader closed part of the position at a loss approximately 11 hours prior to the update. Source: Onchain Lens on X. According to @OnchainLens, citing the HyperBot dashboard for address 0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872, the position shows a current floating loss of about $480K and an overall loss exceeding $21.6M. Source: hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872; Onchain Lens on X. According to @OnchainLens, the HyperBot page provides real-time PnL and liquidation tracking for this position, offering traders direct visibility into ongoing risk. Source: hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872; Onchain Lens on X.

According to @OnchainLens, the Bitcoin OG wallet increased its 5x Ethereum (ETH) long to a notional USD 335.6M, totaling 100,985.84 ETH with an entry price of 3,158.57 and a reported liquidation price of 2,015.42 (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens, the position shows floating profit above USD 16.6M (source: @OnchainLens). Based on @OnchainLens figures, the liquidation level is approximately 36% below the entry and implies roughly USD 67.1M in initial margin for 5x exposure (source: @OnchainLens). According to @OnchainLens reported levels, traders can use 3,158.57 as a pivot and 2,015.42 as the defined downside risk level when monitoring ETH-related liquidity and risk management (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the tracked account was forced to de-risk overnight with $1.36M realized losses in the past 24 hours and a remaining balance of $211k, source: x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1995295488346931221. According to @ai_9684xtpa, position breakdown shows HYPE closed 40,000 tokens for a $205k realized loss, BTC closed 15 BTC for a $320k realized loss, and ETH reduced by 4,500 ETH for a $429k realized loss, source: x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1995295488346931221. According to @ai_9684xtpa and the linked dashboard, the address still holds an ETH long worth $9.368M with a $473k unrealized loss, a liquidation price at $2,831.58, and only $15.72 of liquidation buffer, source: hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872?ic=6792001762. According to the source, these levels place immediate focus on the ETH $2,831.58 liquidation mark for traders monitoring forced-selling risk, source: hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872?ic=6792001762.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited $2M USDC into HyperLiquid and opened a SOL long position with 5x leverage on Nov 29, 2025 (source: @OnchainLens). The address reference for this trade was shared via a HyperBot trader page link for onchain verification, confirming the leveraged SOL exposure on HyperLiquid at that time (source: @OnchainLens).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0xaFA8a3a41379dC0275EBdC1B6D6bE97b878f7731 withdrew 150 WBTC from Binance about three hours prior, deposited the WBTC into Aave, borrowed 6,000,000 USDC, and is long WBTC with a total position value of $25.75M at an average entry of $85,376.5; the address and flows are visible on Arkham at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xaFA8a3a41379dC0275EBdC1B6D6bE97b878f7731. Sources: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Arkham address explorer.

According to @lookonchain, the #66kETHBorrow whale bought 114,684 ETH worth about $319.4M over the past two days and now holds 489,696 ETH worth about $1.35B, source: @lookonchain on X. The whale currently has $647.7M in debt on Aave with an ETH liquidation price near $1,594, providing a precise liquidation threshold to watch, source: @lookonchain on X.

According to @EmberCN, a whale/institution that flipped from a $24.48M profitable ETH short to a long withdrew 23,994 ETH (~$65.13M) from Binance about 6 hours ago and now holds 489,000 ETH (~$1.35B) at an average cost of $3,273, with an unrealized loss of about $243M. According to @EmberCN, the entity financed the ETH purchases with leverage and currently has $647M USDT debt on Aave, implying roughly a 48% LTV versus the reported ~$1.35B current valuation, signaling a sizable leveraged long exposure in ETH. Based on figures reported by @EmberCN, the $3,273 average cost is a key pivot for positioning and a $100 move in ETH would swing PnL by roughly $48.9M on the 489,000 ETH stack, while traders can monitor the wallet’s Aave health metrics and on-chain flows for potential forced-unwind signals cited by @EmberCN.

According to @lookonchain, Machi (@machibigbrother) was liquidated again on HyperLiquid while running an ETH long position (source: @lookonchain). He then deposited another 256.7K USDC on HyperLiquid to continue going long on ETH, signaling ongoing leveraged exposure (source: @lookonchain). The post describes this as revenge trading in an effort to recover prior losses (source: @lookonchain).

According to @OnchainDataNerd, on-chain trader 0xbbc opened a 5x long position of approximately $6.58M on STRK at an entry near $0.14 two days prior, now showing about $2.45M in unrealized profit with roughly 186% ROI at the time of reporting, source: @OnchainDataNerd; hypurrscan.io/address/0xbbc0a674EeEe74717D7a3DeED9d43D55087bc032. The same address opened a 10x long on HYPE roughly four hours prior at an entry near $38.126, source: @OnchainDataNerd; hypurrscan.io/address/0xbbc0a674EeEe74717D7a3DeED9d43D55087bc032. Verification address: hypurrscan.io/address/0xbbc0a674EeEe74717D7a3DeED9d43D55087bc032, source: @OnchainDataNerd; hypurrscan.io/address/0xbbc0a674EeEe74717D7a3DeED9d43D55087bc032.

According to @lookonchain, trader Machi (@machibigbrother) was liquidated as ETH price dropped and immediately reopened a long on 3,075 ETH sized at about 9.6M USD with a liquidation price at 3,043.72, based on on-chain tracking and Hyperdash data. According to @lookonchain, Machi’s cumulative realized losses now exceed 18.9M USD. According to @lookonchain, machismallbrother.eth closed his position earlier with a 1.55M USD loss but remains up about 7.3M USD overall, per the same Hyperdash-referenced on-chain data.

According to @EmberCN, an ETH trader known as Maji had all ETH long positions liquidated around 7:00 with a realized loss of $3.36 million, source: @EmberCN on X, Nov 17, 2025. According to @EmberCN, the longs were funded by a 3.437 million USDC deposit and were repeatedly liquidated during a pre-dawn drop before being fully closed about an hour prior to the post, total loss $3.36 million, source: @EmberCN on X. According to @EmberCN, after the liquidation, the trader re-entered with approximately $220,000 to long ETH at $3,052, with a reported liquidation price at $3,043, source: @EmberCN on X. According to @EmberCN, the referenced wallet and trade trail can be viewed via hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 for on-chain context, source: @EmberCN on X and hyperbot.network/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872.

According to @EmberCN, an on-chain tracked whale or institution that previously realized USD 24.48 million profit from shorting ETH has accumulated 444,800 ETH at an average USD 3,398 with 1.5x leverage and is now facing an approximate USD 110 million unrealized loss, while transferring 44,000 ETH worth about USD 140 million to Binance early today, source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1989867760487428606; intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/16090b03-b744-484a-8a6d-b1c62b21fd95. The 44,000 ETH transfer equals roughly 9.9 percent of the reported holdings based on the disclosed totals, source: x.com/EmberCN/status/1989867760487428606; intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/16090b03-b744-484a-8a6d-b1c62b21fd95.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a whale opened a leveraged long of 75,417.43 ETH at an average entry of 3,573 dollars and is showing an unrealized loss of 30.84 million dollars on a single address. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; DeBank profiles debank.com/profile/0x85e05c10db73499fbdecab0dfbb794a446feeec8, debank.com/profile/0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c, debank.com/profile/0x6e9e81efcc4cbff68ed04c4a90aea33cb22c8c89 According to @ai_9684xtpa, 15 minutes before the post another address withdrew 16,937 ETH from Binance, approximately 53.91 million dollars, with the author suggesting it could be to lower the average entry price. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X According to @ai_9684xtpa, across three addresses a total of 275,633.73 ETH has been pledged and 315 million dollars of stablecoins have been borrowed. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; DeBank profiles debank.com/profile/0x85e05c10db73499fbdecab0dfbb794a446feeec8, debank.com/profile/0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c, debank.com/profile/0x6e9e81efcc4cbff68ed04c4a90aea33cb22c8c89 According to @ai_9684xtpa, the ownership of these addresses is unknown. Source: @ai_9684xtpa on X

According to @OnchainLens, the whale borrowed an additional $90M USDT and bought 31,131 ETH (~$113M) on Binance, taking totals to 75,418 ETH (~$269.46M) purchased, 109,576 ETH (~$393M) supplied to Aave V3, and $190M USDT borrowed. According to @OnchainLens, these figures imply an on-chain LTV near 48% (190M debt vs 393M collateral) and an average Binance purchase price near $3,573 per ETH (269.46M divided by 75,418). According to @OnchainLens, the activity is tied to Arkham Intelligence explorer address 0xE5C248D8d3F3871bD0f68E9C4743459C43BB4e4c, which consolidates the wallet’s transfers. Based on the sequence reported by @OnchainLens, the loop of borrowing USDT, buying ETH, and supplying ETH to Aave V3 indicates a leveraged long structure that traders can monitor for changes in collateral and debt levels via the linked Arkham address.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, whale address 0xE5C...B4e4c supplied 78,444.11 ETH to Aave and borrowed 100,000,000 USDT with a reported health factor of 2.33 (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain reference: Debank address 0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the entity then sent funds to Binance and withdrew 44,287.8 ETH worth about $156M at an average acquisition price of $3,532.6 (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain reference: Debank address 0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c). Based on Aave documentation, borrowing USDT against ETH collateral to acquire additional ETH constitutes a leveraged long, and declines in ETH price reduce the health factor toward 1.0 and increase liquidation risk (source: Aave Docs). Based on Aave liquidation mechanics, monitoring this address’s Aave health factor and transfer activity offers visibility into position stability and potential forced-selling thresholds, with the reported $3,532.6 cost basis serving as a key reference level for traders (source: Aave Docs; source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain reference: Debank address 0xe5c248d8d3f3871bd0f68e9c4743459c43bb4e4c).